By FORUM 21
Since the concept of sustainable development arose, the Malaysian government
has sought to promote holistic development. It began to implement proactive policies and
strategies at different levels from the 7th Malaysia Plan onwards.
However, the rapid pace of development undertaken in Malaysia has also
resulted in severe environment degradation, depleting non-renewable resources and
social inequity whilst bringing improvements in economic growth.
After 22 years of the historic Rio Summit in Rio de Janeiro, how far has the
Malaysia been successful in achieving sustainable development? How sure are we on
the right path in achieving better quality of life for everyone now and for generations to
come?
Sustainable development indicators [SDIs] provide an empirical and numerical
basis for evaluating performance, for calculating the impact of our activities on the
environment and society, and for connecting past and present activities to attain future
goals. These indicators should be able to give a broader, clearer state of the
phenomenon. Hence, sustainable development should address not only economic
growth but also social progress and environmental protection, the three pillars of
sustainable development being interdependent. Without a proper measurement to track
all types of valuable assets, we will lose these assets without realizing it.
In the Malaysian context, assessments of sustainable development have been
attempted [more as quality of life indices] by government as well as international
institutions. This is the first attempt by a Malaysian group of non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) to establish its own set of SDIs to assess Malaysia’s sustainable
development performance. This initiative has come from Forum 21 which aims to put in
place a system which can help the public and policy makers focus on the objectives, link
them to clearer goals and targets and assess the effectiveness of policies.
Forum members have sought to use publicly available data to draw up the SDIs.
There have been problems because of the paucity of data and the difficulty of tying such
data to sustainable development concepts. Hence this first attempt is limited in scope.
In this Report, the SDIs deal with health [Federation of Family Planning
Associations, Malaysia (FFPAM)], gender equity [National Council of Women’s
Organisations (NCWO)], energy and transportation [Centre for Environment,
Technology and Development, Malaysia (CETDEM)], water resource utilization [World
Wide Fund for Nature Malaysia (WWF-Malaysia)], and social equality [Socio Economic
& Environmental Research Institute (SERI)].
We hope that through this Report, policy makers as well as the public can fully
use these indicators to know what sustainability we have achieved and what irreversible
impacts we have had to the environment. Of course, learning from mistakes should help
steer us to the correct path.
World Wide Fund for Nature Malaysia (WWF-Malaysia)
1.0 Introduction
Development is not possible without water1. Therefore, water resources must be
developed and managed in a sustainable manner to ensure the social, economic and
environmental development of the current and future generations are not jeopardized.
Because of the strong water-development linkage, and as water is a common
factor that cuts across all sectors of development, monitoring the sustainability of water
resources can effectively provide an indication of sustainable development in a country.
Hence, the Sustainable Development Indicators (SDI) for water as compared to other
SDIs is perhaps the most representative of sustainable development.
This paper presents the assessment of major issues pertaining to the
sustainability of water resources use and development in Malaysia, and recommends
appropriate SDIs for measuring the sustainability of water resources.
1.1 Water Resource Availability
Malaysia is considered a country “rich” in water resources. The country receives
an average of about 3,000mm rainfall annually which makes up a total volume of some 990
billion cubic metres (BCM) (1 BCM = 1 million Mega litres) of total annual water resources.
Of this amount, 360 BCM comprise unavailable water that is needed to maintain the
process of evapo-transpiration within the water cycle. The remaining 630 BCM (i.e.
groundwater of 64 BCM plus surface runoff of 566 BCM) constitute the country’s total
available water. This amount translates to approximately 20,000 cubic metres of water
available per person per year. However, due to the degradation of water resources and
water catchments, the amount of available and usable water may be much less than this
figure. Based on this premise, an estimate of 5,400 cubic metres per capita per year was
suggested by Salmah Zakaria & Rafidah Kassim (1999). Yet when compared with the
amounts of water resources available to people in many of the African countries where
the per capita renewable water is commonly less than 1,000 cubic metres per capita per
year, the corresponding amount available to Malaysians is truly enormous.
Table 1: Estimated Total Annual Water Resource in Malaysia
(Source: Hj. Keizrul bin Abdullah, 1998)
(Note: 1 BCM (Billion Cubic Metres) = 1 Million Mega litres)
Hydrological Parameter Total Volume per Annum (Billion m3)
1. Annual Rainfall (3,000 mm) 990
2. Evapo-transpiration 360
3. Effective Rainfall (1 – 2) 630
4. Surface Runoff 566
5. Groundwater Recharge 64
6. Total Water Demand 15.5 (2.7 % of Surface Runoff)
1 Water is taken to mean freshwater, unless specified otherwise.


